Skip to main content

Photo and Visual Editors Remote AI Output Review

Posted yesterday

auraone human dataNew York (NY)

SENIORITY

Mid

Apply (opens in a new tab)

About the role

Photo and Visual Editors — Remote AI Output Review is a remote evaluation track for reviewing photo and visual editors evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain. Why this role matters AI data reviewers help turn photo and visual editors evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.
Responsibilities: Evaluate photo and visual editors evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Photo and Visual Editors — Remote AI Output Review assignments. Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale. Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags. Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates. Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week. Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.
Qualifications: Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on photo and visual editors evaluation or adjacent content for Photo and Visual Editors — Remote AI Output Review work. Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches. Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied. Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem. Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week. Example tasks Compare two photo and visual editors evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale. Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity. Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead. Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.
Nice to have: Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review. Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles. Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss. SkillsModel output evaluation Rubric-based annotation Severity tagging Inter-rater calibration Photo and Visual Editors evaluation Design Work model Remote — US-eligible. Remote Independent specialist contractor.
Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.Compensation
Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Before you apply

Applying takes about a minute. These four things decide how fast it moves after that.

Your profile is current

It's what we read first. Occupations, seniority and locations matter more than a long history.

Two examples you can talk through

Not a portfolio — just two pieces of work where you can explain the decisions and what you'd change.

A number in mind

What you're on now and what would make you move. We negotiate better when we know both.

Your notice period

Employers plan around it, and it's the question that stalls offers most often.

Once you apply, someone reads it and calls you before anything reaches the employer — usually within two working days.

More like this